COMP 6660 · Module 2 Threats, Architecture & Infrastructure

Module overview · Units 3–5 · 22 Lessons

COMP 6660 · Enterprise Cybersecurity Module 2 — Threats, Architecture, and Infrastructure Protection

The technical core of the course. Module 2 pairs rigorous adversary analysis with the architectures, network controls, detection technologies, and platform security practices used to defend modern enterprise estates.

Units: 3 Lessons: 22 Forums: 3, 4 & 5 Assessment: Assignment 2 (20%) Weeks: 6–11

01 Purpose and position in the course

Module 2 is where the course becomes technical. It asks how enterprises are actually attacked, how they are architected to resist and detect those attacks, and how the resulting controls are applied across the modern estate.

The module occupies the largest block of study in COMP 6660 — three units, twenty-two lessons, and roughly eleven weeks of the paced schedule. It is deliberately structured as a progression from analysis, through architecture, to application. Each unit prepares the ground for the next.

Unit 3 builds the adversary and risk picture. Students work through risk fundamentals, structured threat modelling, and vulnerability assessment before examining specific attack classes: malware and ransomware, social engineering and phishing, advanced persistent threats, insider threats, and supply-chain compromise. The unit stresses evidence-based mitigation rather than tool-centric thinking.

Unit 4 shifts from adversary to defender. It covers security architecture principles and defence-in-depth, network security protocols, virtual private networks, firewalls and segmentation, and detection technologies including IDS, IPS, SIEM, and XDR. The unit concludes with security operations centre practice — how detection, triage, and response actually run inside an enterprise.

Unit 5 applies these principles across the enterprise estate: operating systems, endpoints, applications, databases, cloud platforms, containers and virtualisation, mobile and IoT devices, and critical infrastructure. The unit stresses that most modern breaches cross these boundaries, and that cloud and platform security now dominate enterprise risk.

Module 2 supplies the technical vocabulary that Module 3's governance, incident-response, and resilience material assumes. Students who can reason about detection coverage, control placement, and platform risk will find the final module substantially easier.

Module 2 at a glance
Module2 — Threats, Architecture, and Infrastructure Protection
UnitsUnit 3 — Threats, Risks, Vulnerabilities, and Cyber Attacks
Unit 4 — Enterprise Security Architectures and Technologies
Unit 5 — Enterprise Systems and Infrastructure Security
Lessons22 (7 + 7 + 8)
Discussion forumsForum 3 — Threat Intelligence and Risk Management
Forum 4 — Enterprise Security Architectures
Forum 5 — Systems and Infrastructure Security
AssessmentAssignment 2 — Enterprise Threat Analysis and Security Architecture (20%)
Recommended weeksWeeks 6–11
Estimated study timeApproximately 75–85 hours across the module

02 Module learning outcomes

Module 2 contributes to the course learning outcomes through a set of module outcomes drawn from the three units. Upon successful completion of the module, students will be able to:

Threats & risk

  • Conduct structured threat analysis and threat modelling.
  • Assess risks and vulnerabilities using recognised methodologies.
  • Evaluate attack techniques across ransomware, social engineering, APTs, insider threats, and supply-chain compromise.
  • Recommend mitigation strategies proportionate to assessed risk.

Architecture

  • Design enterprise security architectures using defence-in-depth and segmentation.
  • Evaluate security technologies including firewalls, VPNs, IDS, IPS, SIEM, and XDR.
  • Recommend appropriate controls for a given enterprise context.

Infrastructure

  • Secure enterprise infrastructures across operating systems, endpoints, applications, and databases.
  • Evaluate cloud, container, virtualisation, mobile, and IoT platform security.
  • Analyse emerging infrastructure threats, including those affecting critical infrastructure.

Security operations

  • Evaluate detection coverage and the operational economics of alerting.
  • Assess SOC maturity and detection engineering practice.

Mapping to course learning outcomes

Module 2 develops and assesses CLO2 (threat, risk, and vulnerability analysis), CLO4 (enterprise security architecture and controls), and CLO5 (applying principles to secure systems and services). It applies CLO3 (cryptography and access control) in network and platform contexts and introduces CLO8 (emerging technologies and trends). Students continue to develop CLO9 through Assignment 2 and three forums. The authoritative mapping is published on the Module 2 learning outcomes page.

03 Structure and recommended sequence

The module runs across weeks 6–11 of the course. The three units are sequential: Unit 4 assumes the threat vocabulary from Unit 3, and Unit 5 assumes the architectural framing from Unit 4.

  1. Unit 3, Lessons 3.1–3.3 — Analysis methods Risk fundamentals; threat modelling methodologies; vulnerability assessment and remediation prioritisation.
  2. Unit 3, Lessons 3.4–3.7 — Attack classes Malware and ransomware; social engineering and phishing; advanced persistent threats; insider threats and supply-chain security.
  3. Forum 3 — Threat Intelligence and Risk Management Initial contribution plus two peer responses on risk methodologies, ransomware trends, or supply-chain attacks.
  4. Unit 4, Lessons 4.1–4.5 — Architecture and network controls Architecture principles; defence-in-depth; network security protocols; VPNs; firewalls and segmentation.
  5. Unit 4, Lessons 4.6–4.7 — Detection and operations IDS, IPS, and threat detection; SIEM, XDR, and SOC operations.
  6. Forum 4 — Enterprise Security Architectures Initial contribution plus two peer responses on architecture patterns, SOC implementation, or cloud security architectures.
  7. Unit 5, Lessons 5.1–5.4 — Compute stack Operating system, endpoint, application, and database security.
  8. Unit 5, Lessons 5.5–5.8 — Platforms and critical infrastructure Cloud security; container and virtualisation security; mobile and IoT security; critical infrastructure security.
  9. Forum 5 — Systems and Infrastructure Security Initial contribution plus two peer responses on cloud governance, container security, or critical infrastructure protection.
  10. Assignment 2 — Enterprise Threat Analysis and Security Architecture Research essay on ransomware as an enterprise threat plus five applied technical questions spanning Units 3–5. Worth 20% of the final grade.

Pacing guidance

Weeks 6–7 cover Unit 3; weeks 8–9 cover Unit 4; weeks 10–11 cover Unit 5 with time reserved for Assignment 2. Because the module is long, students who fall behind often find it easier to compress the attack-class lessons than the analysis methods in Unit 3 — resist that temptation, since the risk vocabulary is reused throughout Modules 2 and 3.

04 Units in detail

Unit 3 — Threats, Risks, Vulnerabilities, and Cyber Attacks

Develops the analytical foundation for enterprise security: how risk is framed and quantified, how threats are modelled, how vulnerabilities are assessed, and how contemporary attack classes actually work.

Unit learning outcomes

  • Conduct threat analysis.
  • Assess risks and vulnerabilities.
  • Evaluate attack techniques.
  • Recommend mitigation strategies.

Unit 4 — Enterprise Security Architectures and Technologies

Moves from adversary to defender: the architectural principles, network controls, and detection technologies that constitute an enterprise security architecture and its security operations function.

Unit learning outcomes

  • Design enterprise security architectures.
  • Evaluate security technologies.
  • Recommend appropriate controls.

Unit 5 — Enterprise Systems and Infrastructure Security

Applies security principles across the enterprise estate — from operating systems and endpoints to applications, databases, cloud platforms, containers, mobile and IoT devices, and critical infrastructure.

Unit learning outcomes

  • Secure enterprise infrastructures.
  • Evaluate cloud and platform security.
  • Analyze emerging infrastructure threats.

05 Key concepts and recurring themes

The concepts below recur across all three units of Module 2 and into Module 3. They form the analytical toolkit students are expected to apply in Assignment 2 and the final examination.

Risk is not severity
A vulnerability rated critical by CVSS is not necessarily the organisation's most important problem. Likelihood, exposure, asset value, and the presence of compensating controls determine what should be fixed first.
Threat modelling precedes control selection
Structured threat modelling identifies assets, adversaries, attack paths, and trust boundaries. Without it, control selection becomes a product catalogue exercise disconnected from the actual attack surface.
Detection economics
Every alert has a cost — in analyst attention, tooling, and response capacity. Detection engineering is as much about reducing false positives and tuning coverage as it is about adding signatures.
Lateral movement and segmentation
Once inside, attackers move east–west between systems. Micro-segmentation, least-privilege service accounts, and identity-aware controls limit how far a single compromised host can reach.
Cloud changes the boundary
The shared responsibility model, cloud identity, and misconfiguration risk have displaced network location as the primary control plane. Most modern enterprise workloads now run on platforms the enterprise does not directly administer.
Supply chain is an enterprise-scale vulnerability
Trust in third-party services, software dependencies, and managed providers means that a single upstream compromise can propagate to thousands of downstream organisations simultaneously.
OT/IT convergence
Industrial control systems and operational technology were designed for availability and safety, not confidentiality. Connecting them to IT networks creates governance and architectural problems that no single control resolves.

Research integration

Module 2 draws on current research literature and enterprise case studies, with particular emphasis on threat intelligence, security operations centres, cloud security, supply chain security, and critical infrastructure protection. These themes are revisited at the governance level in Module 3.

06 How Module 2 is assessed

20%

Assignment 2

Enterprise Threat Analysis and Security Architecture. Covers Units 3, 4, and 5. Research essay on ransomware as an enterprise threat plus five applied technical questions.

~5%

Forums 3, 4 & 5

Three of the six graded discussion forums contributing to the 10% online participation component.

Parts B & C

Final examination

Module 2 concepts supply much of the technical analysis in Part B (40%) and the architectural analysis in the Part C case study (40%).

Assignment 2 — research topic

Ransomware as an Enterprise Threat: Evolution, Defense Strategies, and Organizational Resilience.

Technical questions include:

  • Conduct a threat-modeling exercise.
  • Design a secure cloud-migration architecture.
  • Compare IDS, IPS, SIEM, and XDR.
  • Analyze a supply-chain cyberattack scenario.
  • Design a defence-in-depth strategy for a financial institution.

Full assignment brief →

Discussion forums

Each forum requires an initial contribution of approximately 300–500 words, supported by scholarly sources, plus at least two meaningful peer responses.

  • Forum 3 — Threat Intelligence and Risk Management. Open →
  • Forum 4 — Enterprise Security Architectures. Open →
  • Forum 5 — Systems and Infrastructure Security. Open →

The full rubric is published on the online participation page.

07 Study guidance

This module is much longer than Module 1. How should I pace it?

Plan on approximately seven to eight hours per week across weeks 6–11. Unit 3 is the lightest in reading volume but the heaviest in conceptual groundwork; Unit 5 has the most lessons but is more modular. Do not compress Unit 3 — its risk and threat-modelling vocabulary is used repeatedly in the later units.

How technical do the platform lessons get?

Unit 5 assumes graduate-level computing literacy but does not require hands-on administration of cloud platforms or container orchestrators. The emphasis is on evaluating controls and identifying risk, not on configuring tools. Where practical examples are useful, they are provided in the lesson activities and resource lists.

Do I need to complete Units 3 and 4 before starting Unit 5?

Yes. Unit 5 applies the architectural framing from Unit 4 (defence-in-depth, segmentation, detection) to platform-specific contexts. Reading Unit 5 first tends to produce control-by-control analysis without an architectural rationale.

What should I do before starting Assignment 2?

Complete all three units and all three forums. Assignment 2 integrates threat modelling (Lesson 3.2), attack-class analysis (Lessons 3.4–3.7), architecture design (Lessons 4.1–4.5), detection (Lessons 4.6–4.7), and platform security (Lessons 5.5–5.6). Students who attempt it after only one or two units typically lose marks on integration.

Where do I find the authoritative outcomes and mappings?

The Module 2 learning outcomes page contains the full outcome statements and their mapping to the nine course learning outcomes. The course syllabus carries the authoritative assessment scheme and schedule.

Next module

After Assignment 2, continue to Module 3 — Governance, Operations, and Enterprise Resilience, which begins with cybersecurity governance in Unit 6.

👤