Lesson 4.1 · Week 3 · Reading: Chapter 4

Purpose and Task Definition


Prompt Design Fundamentals — the P in PCAFE-V. Learn to begin every prompt with a clear, legitimate human purpose.

Suggested time: 2.5–3.5 hours Opens Unit 4 Builds on Module 1

Table of Contents

1. Lesson Overview

Every effective prompt begins with a clear sense of why. Without a legitimate human purpose, a prompt becomes an aimless request that may produce fluent but irrelevant, misleading, or even harmful output. This lesson introduces the foundational skill of purpose-driven prompt design — the first and most important element of the PCAFE-V framework.

You will learn to distinguish between the human problem you are trying to solve, the AI-supported task you are assigning, the output you request, the intended use of that output, and the final human action that will follow. You will also learn to identify ambiguity, hidden assumptions, excessive scope, and situations in which a non-AI approach may be more appropriate.

Mastering purpose definition will prepare you to build prompts that are bounded, reviewable, and responsible. It also establishes the foundation for Lessons 4.2–4.4, where you will add context, audience, format, evaluation criteria, and verification requirements to complete the PCAFE-V framework.

Responsible‑use reminder: Do not enter personal, confidential, proprietary, privileged, or security‑sensitive information into any public or unapproved AI system. Use only synthetic, public, or generalised information for all activities.

2. Learning Outcomes

By the end of this lesson, you should be able to:

  1. Define prompt, prompt design, and the five purpose-related distinctions (human purpose, AI task, requested output, intended use, and final human action).
  2. Explain why a prompt should begin with a legitimate human purpose rather than a general request.
  3. Distinguish between the human problem, the AI-supported task, the requested output, the intended use, and the final human action in a given scenario.
  4. Diagnose weak purposes, hidden assumptions, ambiguity, and excessive scope in sample prompts.
  5. Define appropriate scope and exclusions for an AI-supported task, including activities that require human judgment.
  6. Evaluate whether a non-AI alternative is more appropriate for a given situation.
  7. Construct a clear, bounded, purpose-driven instruction that identifies the human need and the AI's supporting role.

3. Before You Begin

4. Retrieval Practice: Concepts from Module 1

Before we dive into purpose, let's refresh the key ideas from Units 1–3 that will support this lesson.

Question 1: What is the AI Paradox as defined in Module 1?

Show answer

Answer: The AI Paradox refers to the tension between the remarkable fluency and apparent intelligence of generative AI outputs and their fundamental lack of understanding, truth-tracking, or genuine reasoning. AI systems can produce coherent, persuasive text without any underlying comprehension or commitment to factual accuracy.

Explanation: This paradox is central to responsible AI use: it reminds us that fluency and polish do not establish truth, authority, or reliability. A well-designed prompt may reduce some errors, but it cannot eliminate the paradox.

Question 2: What is the distinction between capability and suitability in the context of generative AI?

Show answer

Answer: Capability refers to what an AI system can technically do — its functional abilities based on its training and architecture. Suitability refers to whether it is appropriate, responsible, and ethical to use the AI for a particular purpose, given the risks, context, and human oversight available.

Explanation: An AI system may be capable of generating a medical diagnosis, legal brief, or financial forecast, but that does not mean it is suitable to do so. Suitability depends on risk, authority, verification, and human accountability.

Question 3: What does the ORBIT framework help you do?

Show answer

Answer: ORBIT is a framework for evaluating the responsible use of AI. It prompts you to consider Outcome, Risk, Benefit, Integrity, and Transparency when deciding whether and how to use an AI system for a given task.

Explanation: ORBIT helps ensure that you are not just asking "Can AI do this?" but "Should AI be used for this, and under what conditions?"

Question 4: Why does fluency in an AI output not establish truth or reliability?

Show answer

Answer: Generative AI models are trained to produce coherent, contextually appropriate text based on statistical patterns in their training data. They are optimized for plausibility and fluency, not for factual accuracy or truth-tracking. A fluent output may be entirely fabricated, outdated, or misleading while appearing authoritative.

Explanation: This is why human verification and independent fact-checking are essential. Fluency is a feature of the model's language generation, not a guarantee of content quality or accuracy.

5. Opening Scenario: "Use AI to Improve This Process"

📌 Scenario

Context: You are a coordinator in a mid-sized public health organization. Your team is responsible for producing quarterly public health updates for community partners. A colleague sends you a message:

"Can you use AI to improve this process? We need to get these updates out faster and with less effort. Just see what AI can do."

The colleague has not specified:

  • What the actual problem is (e.g., writing speed, data compilation, formatting, distribution);
  • Who the intended audience is (e.g., community partners, internal staff, the public);
  • What the desired output looks like (e.g., a memo, a slide deck, a newsletter);
  • What success would look like;
  • What information can and cannot be shared with an AI system;
  • Who is responsible for reviewing and approving the final product.

Questions for reflection:

  1. What must be clarified before you can responsibly use AI in this situation?
  2. What are the risks of proceeding with the vague request as written?
  3. What elements of a legitimate human purpose are missing?
Show guided analysis

1. What must be clarified? At minimum, you need to know: the specific problem to be solved; the intended audience and their needs; the required output format and content; the sources of information that may be used; privacy and confidentiality boundaries; the level of human review required; and the criteria for success.

2. What are the risks? Without clarification, the AI may produce content that is irrelevant, inaccurate, or inappropriate for the audience. It may include confidential information if not properly bounded. It may create a polished product that appears authoritative but contains errors or omissions. And the team may become over-reliant on AI without proper oversight.

3. What purpose elements are missing? The request lacks: a clearly stated human objective; a defined AI task; a specified output; an intended use; a final human action; scope and exclusions; and success criteria. In short, it has no clear purpose in the PCAFE-V sense.

Key insight: "Use AI to improve this process" is not a prompt; it is a vague wish. Responsible prompt design begins by replacing such wishes with a clear, bounded human purpose.

6. What Is a Prompt?

A prompt is the instruction or input provided to a generative AI system to elicit a response. In everyday usage, a prompt might be a simple question such as "What is the capital of Canada?" But in the context of responsible and effective AI use, a prompt is much more than a question.

A well-designed prompt is a structured specification that conveys:

Prompt design is the practice of crafting such specifications intentionally, iteratively, and responsibly. Prompt engineering extends this practice to more complex, multi-stage, and context-rich workflows (which we will explore in Unit 5).

⚠️ Common misconception

A prompt is not a command that the AI must obey, nor is it a way to force the AI to produce a desired conclusion. The AI is not an employee, a subordinate, or an agent. It is a tool that generates text based on patterns. A well-designed prompt improves the relevance, clarity, and reviewability of the output, but it does not guarantee accuracy, fairness, or responsibility.

7. The Primacy of Purpose

In the PCAFE-V framework, Purpose comes first because it answers the most fundamental question: Why are we doing this? Without a clear purpose, every other element — context, audience, format, criteria, verification — lacks direction.

A legitimate human purpose is an objective that is:

The purpose should be defined before you write the prompt. It is the anchor that prevents the prompt from drifting into irrelevant, inappropriate, or harmful territory.

🎯 Purpose in practice

Weak purpose: "Write something about AI ethics."

Improved purpose: "Help me prepare a provisional one-page explanatory note on the ethical principles of AI use in public health, intended for community health workers with no technical background. The note will support a 30-minute discussion at our quarterly team meeting."

The improved purpose identifies who (community health workers), what (one-page note on ethical principles), why (support a team discussion), and how (provisional, explanatory).

8. Distinguishing Purpose, Task, Output, Use, and Action

One of the most important skills in prompt design is distinguishing five related but distinct concepts:

Table 1. Five purpose-related distinctions
Concept Definition Example
Human Purpose The legitimate human objective the AI-supported task is intended to advance. Help community health workers understand AI ethics so they can make responsible decisions.
AI Task The bounded activity the AI system is asked to support. Generate a one-page explanatory note on AI ethics principles.
Requested Output The specific content or structure the AI is asked to produce. A one-page note with three sections: key principles, common risks, and simple guidelines.
Intended Use How the human will evaluate or apply the output. Review the note for accuracy, adapt it for the team's context, and use it as a discussion starter.
Final Human Action What an accountable person may decide or do after reviewing the output. Lead a team discussion on AI ethics, document decisions, and update organizational guidelines.

These distinctions are important because they clarify who is responsible for what. The AI system is only responsible for generating the requested output (and even that is provisional). The human is responsible for defining the purpose, evaluating the output, and making final decisions.

⚠️ Common mistake

Many novice prompt designers conflate the AI task with the human purpose. For example, they might ask the AI to "write a complete policy recommendation" when the human purpose is actually to "gather ideas for a policy discussion." This mismatch can lead to over-reliance on the AI and insufficient human judgment.

9. Scope and Exclusions

Scope defines what the AI is expected to do and what it is not expected to do. Exclusions are explicit statements of what falls outside the AI's task.

Defining scope and exclusions is essential for:

📋 Example: scope and exclusions for a public health note

Scope (what the AI may do):

  • Generate a one-page draft note summarizing common AI ethics principles from publicly available sources.
  • Suggest three potential risks of AI use in public health communication.
  • Propose simple, actionable guidelines for team members.

Exclusions (what the AI must not do):

  • Provide specific legal or regulatory advice.
  • Reference real patient data or internal organizational records.
  • Make definitive claims about what the organization should do.
  • Generate citations or sources without verification.
  • Assign authority or accountability to the AI itself.

10. Ambiguity and Hidden Assumptions

Ambiguity arises when a prompt uses vague language that can be interpreted in multiple ways. Hidden assumptions are unstated beliefs or premises that the prompt relies on, often without the prompt designer's awareness.

Common sources of ambiguity and hidden assumptions include:

🔍 Example: ambiguity and hidden assumptions

Prompt: "Write a professional report about AI in education."

Ambiguities:

  • What does "professional" mean? (Length? Tone? Structure? Audience?)
  • What aspect of AI in education? (Teaching? Assessment? Administration? Ethics?)
  • What is the report for? (Decision-making? Awareness? Advocacy?)

Hidden assumptions:

  • That the AI knows what "professional report" means in the user's context.
  • That the AI has access to current, accurate information on AI in education.
  • That the report will be used in a certain way (e.g., for a committee review).
  • That AI is an appropriate tool for this task.

The goal is not to ask the AI to resolve every ambiguity or fill every gap. Instead, the goal is for you to identify and clarify these ambiguities and assumptions before you write the prompt. This is part of your responsibility as a human user.

11. When Is a Non‑AI Approach More Appropriate?

Just because AI can be used for a task does not mean it should be. A legitimate human purpose includes a thoughtful consideration of whether AI is the right tool for the job.

A non-AI approach may be more appropriate when:

🧠 Reflection

In the opening scenario, the colleague asked you to "use AI to improve this process." Before committing to AI, you should ask: What is the actual problem? If the problem is "we need a consistent template," a non-AI solution (e.g., designing a template in Word) may be faster, cheaper, and less risky. If the problem is "we need to draft content faster," AI might help, but only with clear purpose, context, audience, format, criteria, and verification.

12. PCAFE-V Walkthrough: Purpose (P)

🎯 Purpose

Definition: The legitimate human objective the AI-supported task is intended to advance.

Role in prompt design: Purpose is the foundation. It answers "Why are we doing this?" and provides direction for every other element. A clear purpose makes it possible to choose appropriate context, audience, format, criteria, and verification requirements.

Guiding questions for purpose

Weak vs. improved purpose

Weak purpose example

"Write something about artificial intelligence."

Why it is weak:

  • No human problem or need is identified.
  • No intended audience or use.
  • No indication of why AI is being used.
  • No scope or exclusions.
  • No success criteria.
Improved purpose example

"Help me prepare a provisional two-page introductory explanation of generative AI for adult undergraduate learners with no programming background. The explanation will support concept review before students complete a comparison activity."

Why it is improved:

  • Identifies the human need (concept review for learners).
  • Specifies the audience (undergraduate learners, no programming background).
  • Defines the intended use (support a comparison activity).
  • Sets a scope (two-page intro, provisional).
  • Provides a context for evaluation (concept review).

Common mistakes

Responsible-use consideration

A purpose-driven prompt helps prevent misuse by making the human objective explicit. When the purpose is clear, it is easier to evaluate whether the AI output serves that purpose, and whether the task should have been done without AI in the first place.

Brief practice

Identify the human purpose in this statement:

"I need a three-bullet summary of the key findings from the latest climate science report for my community newsletter. The summary should be accessible to readers with a high school education and should include a brief note on how these findings affect local weather patterns. I will review it for clarity and accuracy before publishing."

Show analysis

Human purpose: To inform community newsletter readers about key climate science findings and their local relevance, so they can make informed decisions or understand the issue better.

AI task: Summarize key findings from the climate science report.

Requested output: Three-bullet summary with a local-weather note.

Intended use: Review for clarity and accuracy before publishing.

Final human action: Publish the summary in the newsletter (after review).

Purpose application exercise

Task: Write a clear purpose statement for a task of your choice (educational, professional, or everyday). Include: the human need, the intended audience, the intended use, and the final human action.

Show example

Example purpose statement:

"I am planning a community workshop on digital literacy for older adults. I need a provisional outline of workshop topics and activities that will be engaging and accessible for participants aged 65+ with limited digital experience. The outline will help me plan the workshop structure and will be reviewed by a community program coordinator before we finalize the schedule. I will use the outline to develop detailed session plans and materials."

Analysis:

  • Human need: Plan a digital literacy workshop for older adults.
  • Audience: Participants aged 65+ with limited digital experience.
  • Intended use: Provisional outline to assist in planning.
  • Final human action: Review with coordinator, develop detailed plans.

13. Worked Example: From Vague Request to Purpose-Driven Prompt

Let's walk through a complete example of transforming a vague request into a purpose-driven prompt foundation. We will focus on the P (Purpose) element. Later lessons will add C, A, F, E, and V.

🔴 Initial vague request
Help me write something about sustainability.

Step 1: Diagnose the weaknesses

Step 2: Clarify the human purpose

After reflecting, you determine that you are a sustainability officer at a small university. You need to prepare a one-page briefing note on waste-reduction initiatives for the university's executive committee. The note will inform a decision about funding for a new composting program. You will review the draft, add local data, and present it to the committee.

Step 3: Distinguish purpose, task, output, use, and action

Table 2. Purpose-related distinctions for the sustainability briefing
Concept Definition in this context
Human Purpose Inform the executive committee's decision about funding a new composting program by providing a clear, evidence-based briefing on waste-reduction initiatives.
AI Task Generate a draft one-page briefing note summarizing common waste-reduction initiatives in higher education, with a focus on composting programs.
Requested Output A one-page briefing note with three sections: (1) overview of waste-reduction initiatives in higher education, (2) potential benefits of a composting program, (3) implementation considerations.
Intended Use Review the draft, adapt it with local data and context, and use it as a starting point for the committee discussion.
Final Human Action Present the revised briefing to the executive committee and participate in the funding decision.

Step 4: Define scope and exclusions

Scope (what the AI may do):

  • Summarize publicly available information on waste-reduction initiatives in higher education.
  • Identify potential benefits of composting programs (e.g., environmental, financial, educational).
  • Suggest implementation considerations based on general best practices.

Exclusions (what the AI must not do):

  • Provide specific financial projections or cost-benefit analysis for the university.
  • Reference internal university data or confidential information.
  • Make definitive recommendations or decisions.
  • Generate citations or data without verification.

Step 5: Write the initial purpose-driven prompt (purpose element only)

✅ Purpose-driven prompt foundation
Purpose: Prepare a draft one-page briefing note on waste-reduction initiatives in higher education, with a focus on composting programs, to inform an executive committee decision about funding a new program.

Human need: The executive committee needs accessible, evidence-based information to make a responsible funding decision.

AI task: Generate a draft briefing note summarizing common waste-reduction initiatives, benefits of composting, and implementation considerations.

Requested output: One-page note with three sections: overview, benefits, and implementation considerations.

Intended use: I will review the draft, adapt it with local data, and use it as a discussion starter for the committee.

Final human action: I will present the revised briefing to the committee and participate in the funding decision.

Scope: Use publicly available information only. Do not reference internal data.

Exclusions: Do not provide financial projections, make definitive recommendations, or cite unverifiable sources.

Step 6: Identify remaining questions

These questions will be addressed in Lessons 4.2–4.4, where we add Context, Audience, Format, Evaluation Criteria, and Verification Requirements.

14. Guided Learning Activities

🧩 Activity 1: Purpose-Task-Output-Use-Action Classification
  • Purpose: Practice distinguishing the five purpose-related concepts.
  • Learning Outcome: LOs 1 and 3.
  • Estimated Time: 15 minutes.

Instructions: For each statement, identify whether it describes the human purpose, AI task, requested output, intended use, or final human action.

  1. "I need a list of five key considerations for choosing a cloud provider."
  2. "I will present these considerations to my team and lead a discussion on which provider to select."
  3. "The team needs to make an informed decision about cloud provider selection."
  4. "Generate a comparison table of three cloud providers with pricing, features, and support."
  5. "I will use the table as a starting point for our team's evaluation."
Show answers and explanations
  1. Requested output — The user is asking for a specific deliverable (a list of considerations).
  2. Final human action — This describes what the person will do after receiving and reviewing the output.
  3. Human purpose — This is the underlying human need or objective.
  4. AI task — This is what the AI is being asked to do to support the purpose.
  5. Intended use — This describes how the output will be used in the process.

Note: In a complete prompt, all five elements are typically present, but they may be integrated into a single instruction. The key is to be aware of each element's role.

🧩 Activity 2: Weak-Purpose Diagnosis
  • Purpose: Practice diagnosing weak purposes, hidden assumptions, and excessive scope.
  • Learning Outcome: LO 4.
  • Estimated Time: 20 minutes.

Instructions: Analyse each prompt below and identify: (a) the vague purpose, (b) hidden assumptions, (c) excessive scope, (d) missing authority, (e) unstated intended use, and (f) missing human responsibility.

  1. Prompt A: "Write a better marketing strategy."
  2. Prompt B: "Create a comprehensive guide to investing for beginners."
  3. Prompt C: "Analyse the effectiveness of our team's current workflow and suggest improvements."
Show analysis

Prompt A: "Write a better marketing strategy."

  • Vague purpose: What does "better" mean? Better for whom? For what product?
  • Hidden assumptions: The AI knows the product, market, and current strategy.
  • Excessive scope: Marketing strategy is a large, complex domain.
  • Missing authority: Who is responsible for implementing the strategy?
  • Unstated intended use: Will this be presented to a board? Used internally?
  • Missing human responsibility: Who will evaluate and adapt the strategy?

Prompt B: "Create a comprehensive guide to investing for beginners."

  • Vague purpose: "Comprehensive" is undefined. What type of investing?
  • Hidden assumptions: The AI knows what "beginners" need and what investing topics are relevant.
  • Excessive scope: Investing is a vast field; "comprehensive" is unrealistic.
  • Missing authority: The AI cannot give financial advice.
  • Unstated intended use: Is this for a course, a blog, a client?
  • Missing human responsibility: Who will verify the accuracy of the guide?

Prompt C: "Analyse the effectiveness of our team's current workflow and suggest improvements."

  • Vague purpose: What does "effectiveness" mean? What metrics?
  • Hidden assumptions: The AI has access to the workflow and understands the team's context.
  • Excessive scope: Workflow analysis is complex and context-dependent.
  • Missing authority: The AI cannot access internal processes.
  • Unstated intended use: Will the suggestions be implemented?
  • Missing human responsibility: Who will evaluate the suggestions?
🧩 Activity 3: Scope and Exclusion Builder
  • Purpose: Practice defining scope and exclusions for an AI-supported task.
  • Learning Outcome: LO 5.
  • Estimated Time: 15 minutes.

Instructions: For the following scenario, define: (a) what the AI may support, (b) what it must not do, (c) what requires human judgment, (d) what information is outside scope, and (e) whether a non-AI alternative is preferable.

Scenario: You are a course coordinator at a university. You want to use AI to help draft a syllabus for a new course. You have an outline of topics, learning outcomes, and assessment methods. You need a detailed weekly schedule, reading list, and assignment descriptions.

Show solution design

(a) What the AI may support:

  • Generate a draft weekly schedule based on the topics and learning outcomes.
  • Suggest potential readings from publicly available sources.
  • Draft assignment descriptions based on the assessment methods.

(b) What the AI must not do:

  • Create new learning outcomes or assessment methods.
  • Set grade weights or policies.
  • Include copyrighted material without permission.
  • Make decisions about course delivery (e.g., online vs. in-person).

(c) What requires human judgment:

  • Reviewing the draft for alignment with course goals.
  • Approving the final syllabus.
  • Ensuring compliance with institutional policies.
  • Adapting the draft to the specific student population.

(d) What information is outside scope:

  • Student data or personal information.
  • Internal institutional documents.
  • Proprietary course materials.
  • Unverified sources or citations.

(e) Is a non-AI alternative preferable?

  • If the course is standardized and templates exist, a non-AI approach (using a template) may be more efficient.
  • If the course is new and requires creative design, AI can serve as a drafting assistant, but human expertise remains essential.
🧩 Activity 4: Rewriting Vague Purpose Statements
  • Purpose: Practice rewriting vague purpose statements into clear, bounded purpose-driven instructions.
  • Learning Outcome: LO 7.
  • Estimated Time: 20 minutes.

Instructions: Rewrite each vague statement below as a clear purpose-driven instruction that includes: human need, audience, intended use, and final human action.

  1. "Tell me about climate change."
  2. "Make a presentation about leadership."
  3. "Give me some ideas for a fundraising campaign."
Show sample solutions

1. Original: "Tell me about climate change."

Rewritten: "Help me prepare a one-page summary of the latest climate change projections for my local community group. The summary should be accessible to readers with a high school education and should focus on local impacts. I will review the summary and use it as a handout for our next meeting."

Elements present: Human need (community group information), audience (high school education), intended use (handout), final action (review and distribute).


2. Original: "Make a presentation about leadership."

Rewritten: "Draft a 10-slide presentation on transformative leadership for a workshop I am facilitating with mid-level managers at a nonprofit organization. The presentation should include key concepts, real-world examples, and discussion questions. I will review the draft, customize it for the organization's context, and use it to facilitate a 90-minute session."

Elements present: Human need (facilitate a workshop), audience (mid-level managers), intended use (facilitation), final action (review and customize).


3. Original: "Give me some ideas for a fundraising campaign."

Rewritten: "Generate a list of five creative fundraising campaign ideas for a small community arts organization. The ideas should be low-cost, feasible within 3 months, and suitable for engaging local donors and community members. I will review the ideas with the board and select two to develop further."

Elements present: Human need (fundraising for arts org), audience (board and community), intended use (review and select), final action (develop selected ideas).

15. Exercises

📝 Exercise 1: Distinguish Purpose, Task, Output, Use, and Action
  • Learning Outcome: LO 3.
  • Estimated Time: 10 minutes.

Instructions: A student asks an AI system to "write a five-paragraph essay on the causes of World War I." Identify the human purpose, AI task, requested output, intended use, and final human action that could be inferred or should be clarified.

Show sample solution

Human purpose (inferred): The student needs to complete an assignment or understand the causes of World War I.

AI task (stated): Write an essay.

Requested output (stated): Five-paragraph essay on the causes of World War I.

Intended use (unclear): Will the student submit the essay as their own work? Use it as a reference? Revise it?

Final human action (unclear): What will the student do after receiving the essay?

Clarification needed: The purpose is not stated. The student should clarify: Is this for a course? Is it for personal learning? Will it be submitted? How will it be evaluated? What are the academic integrity rules?

Ethical note: Using AI to generate an essay that is submitted as one's own work without disclosure may violate academic integrity policies. The student should check their institution's AI-use policy.

📝 Exercise 2: Rewrite Vague Purpose Statements
  • Learning Outcome: LO 7.
  • Estimated Time: 15 minutes.

Instructions: Rewrite the following vague statement as a clear, purpose-driven instruction. Include: human need, audience, intended use, and final human action. "Help me understand quantum computing."

Show sample solution

Rewritten:

"I am a business analyst at a technology consulting firm. I need a non-technical introduction to quantum computing to help me understand its potential business applications. The introduction should be at a level suitable for a professional with a business background but no physics or computer science training. I will use this introduction to brief my team and to identify areas where we might explore opportunities. I will review the content for clarity and accuracy and will seek expert validation before using it in client discussions."

Analysis:

  • Human need: Understand quantum computing for business applications.
  • Audience: Business analysts with no technical background.
  • Intended use: Brief the team, identify opportunities.
  • Final action: Review, seek expert validation, use in client discussions.
📝 Exercise 3: Identify Hidden Assumptions and Ambiguities
  • Learning Outcome: LO 4.
  • Estimated Time: 15 minutes.

Instructions: Identify at least four hidden assumptions or ambiguities in the following prompt: "Summarize the most recent research on the effectiveness of mindfulness meditation for workplace stress."

Show sample solution

Ambiguities:

  • "Most recent" — How recent? Last year? Last five years?
  • "Effectiveness" — Measured how? Stress reduction? Productivity? Satisfaction?
  • "Workplace stress" — What kind of workplace? Corporate? Healthcare? Education?

Hidden assumptions:

  • The AI has access to the most recent research (it may not).
  • The AI can distinguish credible from non-credible research.
  • The AI understands what "mindfulness meditation" encompasses.
  • The summary will be used for a specific purpose (e.g., a report, a wellness program).
  • The user trusts the AI to accurately summarize complex research.
📝 Exercise 4: Define Scope, Exclusions, and a Non-AI Alternative
  • Learning Outcome: LO 5, 6.
  • Estimated Time: 15 minutes.

Instructions: For the following scenario, define scope, exclusions, and identify whether a non-AI alternative might be more appropriate.

Scenario: You are a non-profit program manager. You want to use AI to help draft a funding proposal for a new community program. You have a program concept, goals, and some rough budget estimates.

Show sample solution

Scope (what the AI may do):

  • Help structure the proposal based on common funding proposal templates.
  • Suggest language for program description, goals, and outcomes.
  • Draft a narrative based on the concept and goals you provide.
  • Identify potential gaps or areas that need more detail.

Exclusions (what the AI must not do):

  • Create budget figures or financial projections.
  • Identify specific funders or funding opportunities.
  • Provide legal or regulatory advice.
  • Include unverified claims or statistics.
  • Make final decisions about program design.

Non-AI alternative:

  • If your organization has a standard proposal template or successful past proposals, using those as references may be more reliable than AI.
  • If you have a colleague who has experience with funding proposals, their human insight may be more valuable than AI-generated suggestions.
  • AI may be useful as a brainstorming and drafting tool, but human expertise remains essential for a high-stakes proposal.

16. Homework Problems

Formative · Ungraded · Recommended for portfolio preparation and Assignment 1 evidence.

🧠 Problem 1: Concept Distinction

Learning Outcome: LO 3. Estimated Time: 5 minutes.

Instructions: A user says: "I need a report on the impact of remote work on employee productivity." Identify whether each of the following is a human purpose, AI task, requested output, intended use, or final human action. (a) The report will help the HR team decide whether to continue remote-work policies. (b) Generate a report summarizing research on remote work and productivity. (c) The HR team will review the report and vote on policy recommendations.

Show answers

(a) Intended use — The report is being used to inform a decision.

(b) AI task — This is what the AI is being asked to do.

(c) Final human action — This describes what the humans will do after reviewing the output.

Note: The human purpose (why the report is needed) is implied but not explicitly stated: "The HR team needs to make an evidence-based decision about remote-work policies."

🧠 Problem 2: Concept Distinction

Learning Outcome: LO 3. Estimated Time: 5 minutes.

Instructions: A student says: "Write a summary of Plato's Allegory of the Cave for my philosophy class." Identify the human purpose, AI task, requested output, intended use, and final human action. If any are missing, state what is missing and suggest what the student should clarify.

Show answers

Human purpose (inferred): To understand or complete an assignment on Plato's Allegory of the Cave.

AI task (stated): Write a summary.

Requested output (stated): A summary of Plato's Allegory of the Cave.

Intended use (unclear): Will the student study it, submit it, or revise it?

Final human action (unclear): What will the student do after receiving the summary?

Missing clarity: The student should clarify: Is this for personal study? Is it to be submitted? Will it be used as a reference for a larger assignment? What are the academic integrity rules?

🧠 Problem 3: Vague Purpose Rewrite

Learning Outcome: LO 7. Estimated Time: 10 minutes.

Instructions: Rewrite the following vague purpose statement as a clear, purpose-driven instruction: "Help me plan a community event."

Show sample solution

Rewritten: "I am a coordinator for a local neighbourhood association. I need to plan a community clean-up event for the spring. The event should be family-friendly, involve volunteers, and improve public spaces. I will use the AI to help me generate a list of activities, a volunteer recruitment plan, and a basic event schedule. I will review the draft with the association board and finalize the plan for implementation."

Elements present: Human need (plan a clean-up event), audience (families and volunteers), intended use (draft for board review), final action (finalize and implement).

🧠 Problem 4: Hidden Assumptions

Learning Outcome: LO 4. Estimated Time: 10 minutes.

Instructions: Identify at least five hidden assumptions in this prompt: "Advise me on what to do next in my career."

Show sample solution
  1. The AI knows the user's current career situation, skills, and interests.
  2. The AI understands the user's industry and job market.
  3. The AI can provide valid career advice.
  4. The AI knows what the user values in a career.
  5. The user wants and is ready to act on advice.
  6. The user's career situation is a problem that AI can help with.
  7. The AI has access to current, accurate labour market information.

Additional concern: Career advice is high-stakes and requires human judgment, confidentiality, and a deep understanding of the individual's context. An AI system cannot replace a human career counsellor, mentor, or the user's own reflection.

🧠 Problem 5: Excessive Scope

Learning Outcome: LO 4, 5. Estimated Time: 10 minutes.

Instructions: The prompt "Help me solve the climate crisis" has excessive scope. Suggest how to narrow this to a manageable AI-supported task with a clear human purpose.

Show sample solution

Narrowed purpose: "Help me prepare a 10-minute presentation for my local community group on three actions individuals can take to reduce their carbon footprint. The presentation should be accessible, practical, and include simple data visualizations. I will review the content, adapt it for the local context, and present it at our next meeting."

Why this is narrower:

  • It focuses on a specific aspect (individual actions).
  • It has a specific audience (local community group).
  • It has a specific output (10-minute presentation).
  • It has a specific use (presentation at a meeting).
  • It has a clear human role (review, adapt, present).

The original prompt asked the AI to "solve the climate crisis," which is far beyond the capability and suitability of any current AI system. A responsible purpose must be bounded.

🧠 Problem 6: Intended Use

Learning Outcome: LO 3. Estimated Time: 5 minutes.

Instructions: A manager asks the AI to "write a performance review for an employee." What is the intended use? What risks does this pose? What should the manager clarify?

Show sample solution

Intended use: The manager likely intends to use the AI-generated text as part of or as the employee's performance review.

Risks:

  • AI cannot assess an employee's actual performance, which requires human observation and judgment.
  • AI-generated reviews may be generic, inaccurate, or unfair.
  • Using AI for performance evaluations may violate privacy or labour laws.
  • It may undermine trust and fairness in the workplace.

What to clarify:

  • Is AI appropriate for this high-stakes task?
  • What is the human review process for the AI-generated text?
  • What employee data can be used?
  • What is the policy on AI use in performance management?
  • Is a non-AI approach more appropriate?

Key point: Performance reviews are high-stakes, require human judgment, and involve confidential information. Using AI for this purpose without careful consideration is irresponsible.

🧠 Problem 7: Exclusion Definition

Learning Outcome: LO 5. Estimated Time: 10 minutes.

Instructions: For the scenario of using AI to draft a course syllabus (from Activity 3), write three specific exclusions that should be included in the prompt.

Show sample solution
  1. The AI must not include any course policies or grade weights; these must be determined by the instructor.
  2. The AI must not include copyrighted readings without permission or proper attribution.
  3. The AI must not make any statements about institutional requirements or accreditation; these must be verified with the appropriate office.

Rationale: These exclusions prevent the AI from making decisions or statements that require human authority, institutional knowledge, or legal compliance.

🧠 Problem 8: Non-AI Alternative

Learning Outcome: LO 6. Estimated Time: 5 minutes.

Instructions: A small business owner wants to use AI to write a marketing email. Describe a non-AI alternative and explain when it might be more appropriate.

Show sample solution

Non-AI alternative: The business owner could use a template from a marketing resource or adapt a previous successful email.

When it might be more appropriate:

  • If the email is short and straightforward, a template may be faster and more reliable.
  • If the business owner has a strong sense of their brand voice and audience, they may prefer to write it themselves to maintain authenticity.
  • If the email contains sensitive information or requires legal review, AI may introduce unnecessary risk.
  • If the business owner is concerned about data privacy or intellectual property.

AI may still be useful for brainstorming subject lines or generating variations, but it should not replace human judgment in crafting customer communications.

🧠 Problem 9: Transfer Problem

Learning Outcome: LO 7. Estimated Time: 10 minutes.

Instructions: Apply the purpose-driven approach to a task from your own life or work. Describe: the human problem, legitimate purpose, intended outcome, AI-supported task, requested output, intended use, final human action, scope, and exclusions. Write an initial purpose-driven prompt.

Show sample solution design

Example task: Planning a family vacation.

  • Human problem: Need to plan a 7-day vacation for a family of four within a budget.
  • Legitimate purpose: Plan a vacation that balances cost, activities, and family preferences.
  • Intended outcome: A feasible itinerary.
  • AI task: Suggest a tentative itinerary, activity ideas, and budget breakdown.
  • Requested output: A 7-day itinerary with activities, approximate costs, and daily schedule.
  • Intended use: I will review the draft, check for feasibility, and adjust based on family preferences.
  • Final human action: Book accommodations and activities, finalize the budget.
  • Scope: Use publicly available information about destinations, activities, and typical costs.
  • Exclusions: Do not book anything, do not include personal financial information, do not assume specific family preferences without being told.

Initial prompt: "Help me plan a 7-day family vacation to a beach destination. Provide a tentative itinerary, activity suggestions, and a rough budget breakdown. I will review and adjust everything before booking."

17. Mini‑Project: Purpose‑Driven Prompt Foundation

📁 Purpose‑Driven Prompt Foundation
  • Estimated Effort: 60–90 minutes.

Context choices: Select one bounded task from:

  • Learning (e.g., preparing for an exam, understanding a concept)
  • Professional practice (e.g., drafting a memo, preparing a briefing)
  • Communication (e.g., writing an email, preparing a presentation)
  • Organizational activity (e.g., planning a meeting, designing a process)
  • Everyday life (e.g., planning a trip, researching a purchase, organizing an event)

Deliverable: Create a document with the following components (approximately 300–500 words total).

  1. Human problem: Describe the real problem or need.
  2. Evidence or reason for the need: Why is this important?
  3. Legitimate purpose: State the human objective clearly.
  4. Intended outcome: What should improve as a result?
  5. AI-supported task: What will the AI do?
  6. Requested output: What will the AI produce?
  7. Intended use: How will you use the output?
  8. Final human action: What will you do after receiving and reviewing the output?
  9. Scope: What is included in the AI's task?
  10. Exclusions: What is explicitly outside the AI's task?
  11. Non-AI alternative: Is there a non-AI approach that may be better? Why or why not?
  12. Initial prompt: Write a draft prompt that incorporates all the above.
  13. Remaining questions: What do you still need to clarify?

Self-Assessment Criteria:

  • Is the human purpose legitimate, clear, and human-centred?
  • Are purpose, task, output, use, and action clearly distinguished?
  • Is the scope appropriately bounded?
  • Are exclusions explicit and meaningful?
  • Is the non-AI alternative thoughtfully considered?
  • Is the prompt clear and actionable?
  • Are remaining questions identified?
Show staged hints

Hint 1: Choose a manageable task. Avoid high-stakes tasks (e.g., medical diagnosis, legal advice, financial planning). Focus on tasks where the output is provisional and reviewable.

Hint 2: Start with the human problem. Before you think about AI, think about what you are trying to achieve. Write it down in one sentence.

Hint 3: Distinguish carefully. Use the table from section 8 to check that you have distinguished each concept.

Hint 4: Be specific about scope and exclusions. What should the AI do? What must it not do? What requires human judgment?

Hint 5: Consider the non-AI alternative. Would a template, a checklist, or a human expert be better? If so, why are you considering AI?

Show solution architecture
  1. Human problem: Describe the situation in plain language.
  2. Legitimate purpose: State the outcome that serves a human need.
  3. Intended outcome: What will be different or better?
  4. AI task: The specific support the AI will provide.
  5. Requested output: The form and content of the AI's response.
  6. Intended use: How you will engage with the output.
  7. Final human action: What you will do with the output.
  8. Scope: Boundaries of the AI's work.
  9. Exclusions: Explicit limitations.
  10. Non-AI alternative: Consideration of other approaches.
  11. Initial prompt: A draft that includes all elements.
  12. Remaining questions: What still needs clarification.
Show illustrative partial example (different context)

Context: Planning a professional development workshop for a team of 15 people.

Human problem: I need to design a half-day workshop on communication skills for my team. I have a general idea but need to structure the content and activities.

Legitimate purpose: Improve team communication skills and foster a more collaborative work environment.

Intended outcome: A practical, engaging workshop that participants find useful and actionable.

AI task: Suggest a workshop structure, including topics, activities, and timing.

Requested output: A 4-hour workshop agenda with 5–6 modules, each with a topic, activity description, and estimated time.

Intended use: I will review the draft, adapt it for my team's specific needs, and use it to develop detailed materials.

Final human action: I will deliver the workshop and collect feedback for future improvements.

Scope: Use general best practices in team communication and workshop design.

Exclusions: Do not include specific team members' names or performance issues. Do not provide assessment or evaluation of team members.

Non-AI alternative: I could use a pre-existing workshop template or consult a professional trainer. AI is useful for generating a draft, but the final design requires my knowledge of the team.

Initial prompt: "Help me design a half-day professional development workshop on communication skills for a team of 15. Provide a draft agenda with 5–6 modules, each with a topic, activity description, and timing. I will review and adapt the draft for my team."

Remaining questions: What specific communication skills are most relevant to this team? What are the team's current challenges? What is the ideal workshop environment?

18. Self‑Check Quiz

Test your understanding of the key concepts from this lesson.

Question 1: What is the first element of the PCAFE-V framework?

Select one:
Show answer

Correct answer: Purpose.

Explanation: PCAFE-V stands for Purpose, Context, Audience, Format, Evaluation Criteria, and Verification Requirements. Purpose comes first because it provides the foundation for all other elements.

Question 2: Which of the following is NOT a characteristic of a legitimate human purpose?

Select one:
Show answer

Correct answer: AI-driven.

Explanation: A legitimate human purpose is human-centred, bounded, ethically grounded, and accountable. It is driven by human needs, not by the AI's capabilities.

Question 3: What is the difference between the AI task and the requested output?

Select one:
Show answer

Correct answer: The task is broader; the output is the specific product.

Explanation: The AI task is the overall activity the AI is asked to support (e.g., "generate a briefing note"). The requested output is the specific content or structure the AI is asked to produce (e.g., "a one-page note with three sections").

Question 4: Which of the following is an example of a hidden assumption in a prompt?

Select one:
Show answer

Correct answer: The AI knows what "latest" means.

Explanation: A hidden assumption is an unstated belief that the prompt relies on. Assuming the AI knows what "latest" means in the context of research is a hidden assumption.

Question 5: What should you do when you identify ambiguity in a prompt?

Select one:
Show answer

Correct answer: Clarify it yourself before finalizing the prompt.

Explanation: It is your responsibility as the human user to clarify ambiguities and define terms. While you can ask the AI to seek clarification, the primary responsibility is to ensure the prompt is as clear and bounded as possible before you submit it.

Question 6: Which of the following is an appropriate exclusion for a prompt about drafting a funding proposal?

Select one:
Show answer

Correct answer: Create budget figures and financial projections.

Explanation: Budget figures and financial projections require human expertise, organizational knowledge, and accountability. They should be an exclusion because the AI cannot verify financial data or be held accountable for financial decisions.

Question 7: What is the intended use in the purpose-related distinctions?

Select one:
Show answer

Correct answer: How the human will evaluate or apply the output.

Explanation: The intended use describes what the human will do with the output: how it will be used, evaluated, or applied. It bridges the AI's output and the final human action.

Question 8: Why might a non-AI approach be more appropriate than using AI for a task?

Select one:
Show answer

Correct answer: The task involves high-stakes decisions requiring human judgment.

Explanation: A non-AI approach may be more appropriate when the task requires human judgment, empathy, accountability, or involves confidential information. AI is not always the best tool.

19. Assignment 2 Portfolio Connection

Assignment 2: Prompt Engineering Portfolio (15% of final grade) requires you to submit three complete prompt-engineering entries in three contexts: educational, professional or workplace, and personal or everyday life.

For each portfolio entry, you will need to retain:

  • Human purpose and task definition
  • Initial prompt and initial output
  • PCAFE-V diagnosis
  • Information-minimization decisions
  • Audience profile
  • Format specification
  • Evaluation criteria
  • Verification requirements
  • Revised prompt and revised output
  • Comparison and remaining limitations
  • Human decisions and AI-use record

For Lesson 4.1: Save the human purpose, initial prompt, and the distinction between purpose, task, output, use, and action for each of your three contexts. These will form the foundation of your portfolio entries.

Use the mini-project from this lesson as a starting point. You can adapt it for each of the three required contexts. The work you do here will be extended in Lessons 4.2–4.4.

⚠️ Important

Do not use real personal, confidential, proprietary, or sensitive information in your portfolio. Use synthetic, public, or generalized information. Your portfolio should demonstrate your understanding of prompt design, not share private data.

20. Assignment 1 Journal Connection

📝 Unit 4 Journal Prompts

Assignment 1: AI Learning and Reflection Journal is an ongoing reflective journal throughout the course. For Unit 4, consider the following prompts.

  1. How did defining the human purpose change the way you approached prompting? What did you learn about the importance of starting with "why"?
  2. What ambiguity or hidden assumptions did you identify in your own prompts or in the examples? How did you address them?
  3. How did distinguishing between purpose, task, output, use, and action clarify your understanding of prompt design?
  4. What scope and exclusions did you define for your tasks? Why were these important?
  5. When did you consider a non-AI alternative? What influenced your decision?
  6. What was the most challenging aspect of defining a legitimate human purpose? How did you work through it?
  7. How has your understanding of "prompt" changed after completing this lesson?
Show reflection-planning checklist
  • Choose 2–3 prompts that are most relevant to your experience.
  • Write 150–250 words per selected prompt.
  • Be specific about what you did, learned, and would do differently.
  • Connect your reflection to specific concepts from the lesson (e.g., purpose, scope, exclusions, ambiguity).
  • Include concrete examples from your work (e.g., your mini-project, exercises, or homework).
  • Identify any remaining questions or areas of uncertainty.

21. Key Takeaways

22. Key Terms

Prompt
The instruction or input provided to a generative AI system to elicit a response. In responsible use, a prompt is a structured specification that includes purpose, context, audience, format, criteria, and verification requirements.
Prompt design
The practice of crafting intentional, structured, and responsible instructions for generative AI systems, with attention to purpose, context, audience, format, criteria, and verification.
Human purpose
The legitimate human objective that an AI-supported task is intended to advance. It is the "why" of the prompt and the foundation of responsible AI use.
AI task
The bounded activity that an AI system is asked to support. It is a subset of the human purpose.
Requested output
The specific content or structure that the AI is asked to produce. It is the "what" of the prompt.
Intended use
How the human will evaluate or apply the AI-generated output. It bridges the output and the final human action.
Final human action
What an accountable person will decide or do after reviewing the AI-generated output. It is the "who" and "how" of accountability.
Scope
The boundaries of what the AI is expected to do in support of the task. Scope defines what is included.
Exclusion
An explicit statement of what falls outside the AI's task. Exclusions define what the AI must not do, often to manage risk and preserve human judgment.
Ambiguity
Vague language in a prompt that can be interpreted in multiple ways, leading to unpredictable outputs.
Hidden assumption
An unstated belief or premise that a prompt relies on, often without the prompt designer's awareness.

23. Looking Ahead: Lesson 4.2

In Lesson 4.1, you learned to define a legitimate human purpose, distinguish purpose from task, output, use, and action, and define scope and exclusions. In Lesson 4.2, you will extend this foundation by adding:

Together, Purpose, Context, and Audience form the first three elements of PCAFE-V.

Transition to Unit 5: After completing Unit 4, you will move to Unit 5: Advanced Prompting and Context Engineering, where you will extend individual prompts into multi-stage workflows, handle context drift, and apply the SCOPE framework.

24. Sources & Further Reading

For additional reading, consult your institution's AI-use policy and the latest guidance from professional organizations in your field.

⚠️ Note

Some textbook content, definitions, examples, and figures are marked with placeholders. These will be supplied by the course coordinator or subject-matter expert.


👤