40%
Major research project
An original investigation culminating in a journal-style paper and symposium presentation.
Official course syllabus · Semester 1
The research capstone of the AI sequence. Read and critique frontier literature, reproduce published results, design and run an original investigation, and report it to conference standard.
Syllabus
This syllabus is the authoritative statement of the course. It sets out what you will learn, how the course is structured, how you will be assessed and what is expected of you. Read it alongside the course orientation.
| Course code | COMP529 |
|---|---|
| Course title | Research Topics in Artificial Intelligence |
| Credit points | 15 credits, one semester |
| Level | Undergraduate · Honours / research stream |
| Delivery mode | On campus · seminar and supervision |
| Contact hours | 1 seminar + 1 research supervision session per week |
| Independent study | Approximately 9–11 hours per week, rising during the project phase |
| Prerequisites | COMP329 and COMP429, or equivalent |
| Assumed knowledge | Deep learning model development and evaluation; AI systems engineering; probability and linear algebra; Python and PyTorch |
| Language of instruction | English |
| Assessment | 5 research assignments · 16 unit quizzes · proposal defence · major research project · symposium presentation |
| Course coordinator | Confirmed on the course homepage and in the LMS. |
COMP529 is the sixth and final course of the AI sequence, following COMP326, COMP327, COMP328, COMP329 and COMP429. It assumes the full ladder beneath it and prepares you for postgraduate research.
This course explores frontier topics and emerging directions in artificial intelligence. Students critically evaluate current research literature, replicate state-of-the-art studies, conduct independent investigations, and develop novel AI solutions. Topics vary according to advances in the field but may include foundation models, reasoning systems, multi-agent intelligence, causal learning, scientific machine learning, neuro-symbolic AI, embodied intelligence, AI safety, and future AI architectures.
The course culminates in an original research project and scholarly report.
Applying an existing method requires understanding how to use it. Producing a new one requires understanding why it works, where it fails, what has already been tried, and how to design an experiment that would convince a sceptical reader.
COMP529 develops that second capability. You learn to read research critically, reproduce a published result, formulate your own research question, design and run experiments, analyse results honestly and write them up in conference format.
COMP529 has 130 tutorials against COMP429's 197. This is deliberate: the remaining time is spent conducting research, not consuming content.
It is not a tools course and not a survey course. There is no textbook to memorise. Progress is measured by the quality of the questions you ask and the rigour with which you answer them.
You are expected to arrive able to do all of the following without additional teaching. If any of these are unfamiliar, address them in the first two weeks.
More than in any previous course, you will be expected to interrogate the assumptions behind a method — not merely apply it. Weakness in probability or statistics will surface quickly in the evaluation phase of your project.
On successful completion of COMP529 you will be able to operate as an independent researcher in artificial intelligence.
| LO | On completion you can | Assessed by |
|---|---|---|
| LO1 | Research literacy. Read and critique AI research literature; conduct systematic literature reviews; identify genuine research gaps. | A1, A2, A4, Project |
| LO2 | Experimental design. Formulate precise, testable research questions; design rigorous, well-controlled experiments; evaluate AI methods scientifically and fairly. | A3, A4, A5, Project |
| LO3 | Advanced AI knowledge. Explain frontier AI topics and open problems; compare competing research approaches; analyse the limitations of current methods. | Quizzes, A1, A2, Project |
| LO4 | Scholarly communication. Write research reports in conference format; present scientific findings; defend research conclusions under questioning. | A2, A4, Project, Symposium |
| LO5 | Innovation. Reproduce published research results; extend existing methods in a principled way; propose and justify novel solutions. | A3, A5, Project |
| LO6 | Research practice. Work reproducibly with versioned code and tracked experiments; peer-review constructively; apply research ethics and open-science principles. | All assessment |
COMP529 runs on a research rhythm rather than a lecture rhythm. Each unit follows the same four-part structure, designed to move you from consumer of research to producer of research.
Survey the foundational theory, the seminal papers and the most recent developments in the area.
Interrogate assumptions, evaluation choices and claims. Ask what the paper does not show.
Re-implement a result, or design a small experiment that probes an open question.
Bring your findings to the seminar, defend your reasoning and review your peers' work.
| Mode | Duration | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
| Seminar | 1 hour per week | Paper discussion, critique, method debate and peer review |
| Research supervision | 1 hour per week | Project guidance, experiment design, writing feedback |
| Tutorial pages | Self-paced | 130 structured tutorials: research context, foundational theory, seminal papers, recent developments, open challenges and exercises |
| Independent work | 9–11 hours per week | Reading, reproduction, experimentation, analysis and writing |
| Symposium | End of semester | Conference-format presentation, defence and peer review |
Seminars are discussion-based and cannot be replaced by recordings. Attendance is expected at every seminar and supervision session; the symposium is compulsory.
Eight modules, sixteen units and 130 tutorial pages. Each unit surveys a research area: its foundational theory, its seminal papers, its recent developments, and the open challenges that remain.
| Module | Research focus | Units | Tutorials |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 · Foundations of AI Research | Research paradigms, scientific method and literature analysis | 2 | 16 |
| 2 · Foundation Models & Emerging Architectures | Scaling laws, emergence and reasoning architectures | 2 | 16 |
| 3 · Neuro-Symbolic and Causal AI | Hybrid intelligence, causal inference and counterfactual reasoning | 2 | 17 |
| 4 · Scientific Machine Learning | Physics-informed models and AI-driven knowledge discovery | 2 | 16 |
| 5 · Distributed Intelligence | Multi-agent systems and privacy-preserving collaborative learning | 2 | 16 |
| 6 · Embodied and Autonomous Intelligence | Embodied cognition, robotics and autonomous systems | 2 | 16 |
| 7 · Trustworthy Artificial General Intelligence | Alignment, safety engineering and governance of advanced AI | 2 | 17 |
| 8 · Future Directions in Artificial Intelligence | AGI concepts and the open research frontier | 2 | 16 |
| Total | Eight modules · sixteen units | 16 | 130 |
The full unit sequence is listed below. Each unit is supported by a dedicated unit page containing its tutorial sequence, and each tutorial is a single page with research context, foundational theory, seminal papers, recent developments, open challenges, research exercises and discussion questions.
| Unit | Title | Core topics | Tutorials |
|---|---|---|---|
| U01 | The Nature of AI Research | Research paradigms; scientific inquiry; theory versus experimentation; reproducibility; research ethics | 8 |
| U02 | Research Methods and Literature Analysis | Paper reading; literature reviews; citation analysis; research design | 8 |
| U03 | Scaling Laws and Foundation Models | Scaling laws; emergence; foundation models; general-purpose intelligence | 8 |
| U04 | Reasoning Models and Cognitive Architectures | Chain-of-thought; tree-of-thought; reasoning systems; cognitive architectures | 8 |
| U05 | Neuro-Symbolic Intelligence | Knowledge representation; symbolic systems; hybrid AI; reasoning engines | 8 |
| U06 | Causal Learning and Decision Intelligence | Causal inference; structural causal models; counterfactual reasoning; decision intelligence | 9 |
| U07 | Physics-Informed and Scientific AI | Scientific ML; physics-informed neural networks; computational science; digital twins | 8 |
| U08 | AI for Knowledge Discovery | Drug discovery; bioinformatics; materials science; scientific hypothesis generation | 8 |
| U09 | Multi-Agent Intelligence | Collective intelligence; emergent behaviour; agent societies; coordination mechanisms | 8 |
| U10 | Federated and Collaborative Learning | Federated learning; privacy-preserving learning; distributed optimisation; collaborative AI | 8 |
| U11 | Embodied AI | Embodied cognition; perception-action loops; environment interaction; sensors and actions | 8 |
| U12 | Robotics and Autonomous Systems | Autonomous agents; navigation; planning; human-robot interaction | 8 |
| U13 | AI Alignment and Safety | Goal alignment; safety engineering; risk mitigation; control problems | 9 |
| U14 | Governance of Advanced AI | Global governance; regulation; policy; societal impacts | 8 |
| U15 | Artificial General Intelligence | AGI concepts; human-level intelligence; machine cognition; open questions | 8 |
| U16 | Frontiers of AI Research | Next-generation architectures; open research challenges; emerging paradigms; future outlook | 8 |
| Total tutorial pages | 130 | ||
Every tutorial page follows the same structure, so that you always know what to look for and where the research conversation begins.
The first two units are shown below in full, as an illustration of how a unit's tutorials are ordered. Complete sequences for every unit appear on the unit pages.
| Tutorial | Title |
|---|---|
| t-01 | What is AI Research? |
| t-02 | Research Paradigms |
| t-03 | Scientific Method |
| t-04 | Reproducibility Crisis |
| t-05 | Research Ethics |
| t-06 | Open Science |
| t-07 | Case Studies |
| t-08 | Review |
| Tutorial | Title |
|---|---|
| t-01 | Reading Research Papers |
| t-02 | Literature Mapping |
| t-03 | Citation Networks |
| t-04 | Experimental Design |
| t-05 | Reproducibility Studies |
| t-06 | Meta-analysis |
| t-07 | Critical Review Techniques |
| t-08 | Summary |
Each unit concludes with a short online quiz of sixteen questions in total across the course — one quiz per unit. Quizzes are formative in spirit, may be attempted unlimited times, and exist to confirm that you have the conceptual vocabulary needed for the seminar discussion.
Assessment is overwhelmingly research-based. The five assignments build the skills you need for the major project, which carries the largest weighting.
40%
An original investigation culminating in a journal-style paper and symposium presentation.
30%
Paper analysis, literature review, reproducibility study, proposal and pilot investigation.
10%
Oral defence of your research question, method and evaluation plan.
10%
Conference-format talk with questions from faculty and peer review.
10%
Sixteen short online quizzes, one per unit, with unlimited attempts.
Weightings are indicative and confirmed in the course LMS.
| Task | Weight | Format | Due |
|---|---|---|---|
| A1 · Research Paper Analysis | 6% | Written critique, 1,500 words | Week 3 |
| A2 · Literature Review | 6% | Structured review with gap analysis, 2,500 words | Week 6 |
| A3 · Reproducibility Study | 6% | Implementation, results comparison and report | Week 9 |
| A4 · Research Proposal | 6% | Publishable-quality proposal, 2,000 words | Week 12 |
| A5 · Pilot Investigation | 6% | Dataset, preliminary results and analysis | Week 16 |
| Unit quizzes | 10% | 16 online quizzes, unlimited attempts | Rolling |
| Proposal defence | 10% | Oral defence, 15 minutes plus questions | Week 13 |
| Major research project | 40% | Journal-style paper, 6,000–10,000 words, plus reproducibility package | Assessment period |
| Symposium presentation | 10% | Conference-format talk, 15–20 minutes, plus poster | Assessment period |
| Total | 100% | Pass mark 50% | |
Each assignment rehearses one component of the research process. Together they form a scaffold for the major project; completing them in sequence means that by the time you begin writing the final paper, most of the groundwork is already done.
Critique a recent AI paper.
Conduct a structured literature review.
Replicate a published experiment.
Prepare a publishable-quality proposal.
Conduct preliminary experiments.
A penalty applies to late work unless an extension has been granted in advance. Extensions are granted for documented circumstances; compute failures, lost code and competing deadlines are not, by themselves, grounds for an extension — managing these is part of research practice.
Written feedback is returned on each assignment within the university turnaround window. Assignment 4 and the proposal defence are explicitly designed to feed forward into the major project.
For A3, A5 and the major project, your code, environment, seeds and data handling must allow an independent reader to reproduce your headline result. A finding that cannot be reproduced does not count as a finding.
The project runs across the whole semester and carries 40% of your grade. You work through sixteen phases, from topic selection to final presentation, under regular supervision.
| Checkpoint | Phases | Evidence required | Timing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Stream selection | 01–02 | Chosen stream, draft research question | Week 6 |
| Proposal | 03–07 | Literature review, gap analysis, method and evaluation plan | Week 12 |
| Proposal defence | 05–07 | Oral defence of question, method and evaluation plan | Week 13 |
| Pilot results | 08–10 | Dataset, baselines, preliminary results | Week 16 |
| Full evaluation | 11–13 | Complete experiments, statistical analysis, discussion | Assessment period |
| Final submission | 14–15 | Journal-style paper and reproducibility package | Assessment period |
| Symposium | 16 | Presentation, poster and peer review | Assessment period |
You select one stream for your major research project and pursue it across the second half of the semester, supported by supervision sessions. Each stream is deliberately broad; your contribution will be a specific, tractable question within it.
Reasoning abilities, prompt optimisation, agentic architectures, long-context reasoning.
Stream BBioinformatics, computational biology, digital twins, scientific discovery.
Stream CCausal discovery, counterfactual analysis, decision intelligence.
Stream DCoordination, emergent behaviour, collaborative reasoning.
Stream EAlignment, interpretability, robustness, governance.
The final paper is written in IEEE or ACM format and reviewed by faculty acting as a program committee. Strong submissions are encouraged to submit to undergraduate research venues, workshops or student tracks at conferences.
The semester concludes with a mini-conference. You present your work, defend your methodology, answer questions and review the work of your peers.
Reviewing the work of others is part of research practice. You will be asked to provide structured written reviews of at least two peer submissions, and the quality of those reviews contributes to LO6.
One unit per teaching week, with assessment milestones running in parallel. The mid-semester break carries no new unit and is intended for project work.
| Week | Unit | Focus | Milestone |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | U01 | The Nature of AI Research | A1 released |
| 2 | U02 | Research Methods and Literature Analysis | — |
| 3 | U03 | Scaling Laws and Foundation Models | A1 due |
| 4 | U04 | Reasoning Models and Cognitive Architectures | A2 released |
| 5 | U05 | Neuro-Symbolic Intelligence | — |
| 6 | U06 | Causal Learning and Decision Intelligence | A2 due Stream selection |
| 7 | U07 | Physics-Informed and Scientific AI | A3 released |
| 8 | U08 | AI for Knowledge Discovery | — |
| — | Mid-semester break — no new unit; project work continues | ||
| 9 | U09 | Multi-Agent Intelligence | A3 due |
| 10 | U10 | Federated and Collaborative Learning | A4 released |
| 11 | U11 | Embodied AI | — |
| 12 | U12 | Robotics and Autonomous Systems | A4 due |
| 13 | U13 | AI Alignment and Safety | Proposal defences |
| 14 | U14 | Governance of Advanced AI | A5 released |
| 15 | U15 | Artificial General Intelligence | — |
| 16 | U16 | Frontiers of AI Research | A5 due Paper draft |
| AP | Research symposium — presentation, poster and peer review | Final paper due | |
AP = assessment period. Dates are confirmed in the LMS at the start of semester.
Research infrastructure is provided so that your work can be run, checked and reproduced. You are expected to design experiments that fit within realistic resource limits — which is itself a research skill.
Budget your compute before you begin. A well-scoped experiment that completes is worth more than an ambitious one that never finishes, and the ability to scope work realistically is explicitly part of LO2.
Research is built on trust. Fabricated results, undisclosed assistance and unattributed text are the most serious offences in this course because they corrupt the record on which everyone else depends.
Generative AI is a legitimate research tool and you are expected to be competent with it. Its use is permitted, with three conditions.
Generated citations are frequently fabricated. Every reference in your work must be located, read and confirmed by you. A fabricated citation in a submitted paper is treated as research misconduct, not as a technical error.
Because your code, environment, seeds and raw results are submitted alongside your claims, the reproducibility requirement functions as a built-in integrity check. Work that cannot be reproduced cannot be verified, and unverifiable work is not research.
You are expected to drive your own project, but you are not expected to do it alone. Ask questions in seminars, bring problems to supervision, and give your peers the kind of rigorous, constructive review you would want to receive.
There is no single textbook for COMP529. Reading is drawn from the primary literature, supported by a small number of methodological texts that every researcher should know.
| Category | Representative sources | Used for |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy of science | Popper, Conjectures and Refutations; Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions | Unit 1 · research paradigms |
| Research methodology and reproducibility | Ioannidis (2005), Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, PLoS Medicine; Pineau et al., Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research | Units 1–2 · assignments 1–3 |
| Foundational AI papers | Primary papers per unit, beginning with Vaswani et al. (2017), Attention Is All You Need, and Kaplan et al., Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models | Modules 2–4 |
| Causal inference | Pearl, Causality, and the structural causal model literature | Unit 6 |
| Scholarly writing | IEEE and ACM author guidelines; current conference style guides | Assignments 2, 4 and the project |
You are expected to become familiar with the venues that define your chosen stream. At minimum, know the major conferences and journals in your area, their review criteria, and the difference between a workshop paper and a full conference submission.
Expect to read two to four papers per week in depth, plus skim reading for literature mapping. Reading a paper properly means engaging with its method and its evidence, not summarising its abstract.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Document | COMP529 Course Syllabus |
| Version | 1.0 |
| Applies to | Semester 1 |
| Owner | Course coordinator, COMP529 |
| Review cycle | Reviewed annually before the start of semester |
| Supersedes | Previous semester's syllabus |
| Changes | Assessment weightings and deadlines are confirmed in the LMS at the start of semester. Any change to assessment is communicated in writing to all enrolled students. |
Where this syllabus and the LMS differ, the LMS record of confirmed dates and weightings takes precedence. Report any discrepancy to the course coordinator.
Start with Module 1, Unit 1 — what distinguishes AI research from AI practice, and why reproducibility is the discipline's central problem.