COMP529 Research Topics in AI

Official course syllabus · Semester 1

COMP529 Research Topics in Artificial Intelligence

The research capstone of the AI sequence. Read and critique frontier literature, reproduce published results, design and run an original investigation, and report it to conference standard.

15 credits 8 modules 16 units 130 tutorials 40% research project

01 Course identification

Course record
Course code COMP529
Course title Research Topics in Artificial Intelligence
Credit points 15 credits, one semester
Level Undergraduate · Honours / research stream
Delivery mode On campus · seminar and supervision
Contact hours 1 seminar + 1 research supervision session per week
Independent study Approximately 9–11 hours per week, rising during the project phase
Prerequisites COMP329 and COMP429, or equivalent
Assumed knowledge Deep learning model development and evaluation; AI systems engineering; probability and linear algebra; Python and PyTorch
Language of instruction English
Assessment 5 research assignments · 16 unit quizzes · proposal defence · major research project · symposium presentation
Course coordinator Confirmed on the course homepage and in the LMS.

Curriculum position

COMP529 is the sixth and final course of the AI sequence, following COMP326, COMP327, COMP328, COMP329 and COMP429. It assumes the full ladder beneath it and prepares you for postgraduate research.

  1. COMP326 · Data Science Foundations
  2. COMP327 · Generative AI
  3. COMP328 · Machine Learning
  4. COMP329 · Advanced ML & Deep Learning
  5. COMP429 · AI Systems Engineering
  6. COMP529 · Research Topics in AI

02 Course description

This course explores frontier topics and emerging directions in artificial intelligence. Students critically evaluate current research literature, replicate state-of-the-art studies, conduct independent investigations, and develop novel AI solutions. Topics vary according to advances in the field but may include foundation models, reasoning systems, multi-agent intelligence, causal learning, scientific machine learning, neuro-symbolic AI, embodied intelligence, AI safety, and future AI architectures.

The course culminates in an original research project and scholarly report.

From practitioner to researcher

Applying an existing method requires understanding how to use it. Producing a new one requires understanding why it works, where it fails, what has already been tried, and how to design an experiment that would convince a sceptical reader.

COMP529 develops that second capability. You learn to read research critically, reproduce a published result, formulate your own research question, design and run experiments, analyse results honestly and write them up in conference format.

Fewer units, deeper work

COMP529 has 130 tutorials against COMP429's 197. This is deliberate: the remaining time is spent conducting research, not consuming content.

What this course is not

It is not a tools course and not a survey course. There is no textbook to memorise. Progress is measured by the quality of the questions you ask and the rigour with which you answer them.

03 Prerequisites and assumed knowledge

Formal prerequisites

  • COMP329 Advanced Machine Learning and Deep Learning
  • COMP429 AI Systems Engineering and Intelligent Applications
  • Or equivalent study approved by the course coordinator

Assumed capability

You are expected to arrive able to do all of the following without additional teaching. If any of these are unfamiliar, address them in the first two weeks.

Model development Train, tune and evaluate deep learning models in PyTorch from a clean environment.
Mathematical maturity Read and reason about notation in probability, linear algebra, optimisation and statistics.
Systems engineering Version control, experiment tracking, reproducible environments, containerisation.
Technical reading Work through a research paper independently, including its proofs and appendices.

Mathematical maturity matters

More than in any previous course, you will be expected to interrogate the assumptions behind a method — not merely apply it. Weakness in probability or statistics will surface quickly in the evaluation phase of your project.

04 Learning outcomes

On successful completion of COMP529 you will be able to operate as an independent researcher in artificial intelligence.

Learning outcomes and their assessment
LO On completion you can Assessed by
LO1 Research literacy. Read and critique AI research literature; conduct systematic literature reviews; identify genuine research gaps. A1, A2, A4, Project
LO2 Experimental design. Formulate precise, testable research questions; design rigorous, well-controlled experiments; evaluate AI methods scientifically and fairly. A3, A4, A5, Project
LO3 Advanced AI knowledge. Explain frontier AI topics and open problems; compare competing research approaches; analyse the limitations of current methods. Quizzes, A1, A2, Project
LO4 Scholarly communication. Write research reports in conference format; present scientific findings; defend research conclusions under questioning. A2, A4, Project, Symposium
LO5 Innovation. Reproduce published research results; extend existing methods in a principled way; propose and justify novel solutions. A3, A5, Project
LO6 Research practice. Work reproducibly with versioned code and tracked experiments; peer-review constructively; apply research ethics and open-science principles. All assessment

05 Teaching and learning approach

COMP529 runs on a research rhythm rather than a lecture rhythm. Each unit follows the same four-part structure, designed to move you from consumer of research to producer of research.

  1. Read the literature

    Survey the foundational theory, the seminal papers and the most recent developments in the area.

  2. Critique the method

    Interrogate assumptions, evaluation choices and claims. Ask what the paper does not show.

  3. Reproduce or extend

    Re-implement a result, or design a small experiment that probes an open question.

  4. Discuss and debate

    Bring your findings to the seminar, defend your reasoning and review your peers' work.

Contact modes

Weekly contact and expectations
Mode Duration Purpose
Seminar 1 hour per week Paper discussion, critique, method debate and peer review
Research supervision 1 hour per week Project guidance, experiment design, writing feedback
Tutorial pages Self-paced 130 structured tutorials: research context, foundational theory, seminal papers, recent developments, open challenges and exercises
Independent work 9–11 hours per week Reading, reproduction, experimentation, analysis and writing
Symposium End of semester Conference-format presentation, defence and peer review

Attendance expectation

Seminars are discussion-based and cannot be replaced by recordings. Attendance is expected at every seminar and supervision session; the symposium is compulsory.

06 Course structure

Eight modules, sixteen units and 130 tutorial pages. Each unit surveys a research area: its foundational theory, its seminal papers, its recent developments, and the open challenges that remain.

Modules, units and tutorial counts
Module Research focus Units Tutorials
1 · Foundations of AI Research Research paradigms, scientific method and literature analysis 2 16
2 · Foundation Models & Emerging Architectures Scaling laws, emergence and reasoning architectures 2 16
3 · Neuro-Symbolic and Causal AI Hybrid intelligence, causal inference and counterfactual reasoning 2 17
4 · Scientific Machine Learning Physics-informed models and AI-driven knowledge discovery 2 16
5 · Distributed Intelligence Multi-agent systems and privacy-preserving collaborative learning 2 16
6 · Embodied and Autonomous Intelligence Embodied cognition, robotics and autonomous systems 2 16
7 · Trustworthy Artificial General Intelligence Alignment, safety engineering and governance of advanced AI 2 17
8 · Future Directions in Artificial Intelligence AGI concepts and the open research frontier 2 16
Total Eight modules · sixteen units 16 130

07 Modules and units

The full unit sequence is listed below. Each unit is supported by a dedicated unit page containing its tutorial sequence, and each tutorial is a single page with research context, foundational theory, seminal papers, recent developments, open challenges, research exercises and discussion questions.

Unit sequence with core topics
Unit Title Core topics Tutorials
U01 The Nature of AI Research Research paradigms; scientific inquiry; theory versus experimentation; reproducibility; research ethics 8
U02 Research Methods and Literature Analysis Paper reading; literature reviews; citation analysis; research design 8
U03 Scaling Laws and Foundation Models Scaling laws; emergence; foundation models; general-purpose intelligence 8
U04 Reasoning Models and Cognitive Architectures Chain-of-thought; tree-of-thought; reasoning systems; cognitive architectures 8
U05 Neuro-Symbolic Intelligence Knowledge representation; symbolic systems; hybrid AI; reasoning engines 8
U06 Causal Learning and Decision Intelligence Causal inference; structural causal models; counterfactual reasoning; decision intelligence 9
U07 Physics-Informed and Scientific AI Scientific ML; physics-informed neural networks; computational science; digital twins 8
U08 AI for Knowledge Discovery Drug discovery; bioinformatics; materials science; scientific hypothesis generation 8
U09 Multi-Agent Intelligence Collective intelligence; emergent behaviour; agent societies; coordination mechanisms 8
U10 Federated and Collaborative Learning Federated learning; privacy-preserving learning; distributed optimisation; collaborative AI 8
U11 Embodied AI Embodied cognition; perception-action loops; environment interaction; sensors and actions 8
U12 Robotics and Autonomous Systems Autonomous agents; navigation; planning; human-robot interaction 8
U13 AI Alignment and Safety Goal alignment; safety engineering; risk mitigation; control problems 9
U14 Governance of Advanced AI Global governance; regulation; policy; societal impacts 8
U15 Artificial General Intelligence AGI concepts; human-level intelligence; machine cognition; open questions 8
U16 Frontiers of AI Research Next-generation architectures; open research challenges; emerging paradigms; future outlook 8
Total tutorial pages 130

Anatomy of a tutorial

Every tutorial page follows the same structure, so that you always know what to look for and where the research conversation begins.

  1. Research contextWhy this topic matters and where it sits in the field.
  2. Foundational theoryThe concepts and formalism you need before reading the papers.
  3. Seminal papersThe work that defined the area, with guided reading notes.
  4. Recent developmentsWhat has changed in the last few years and what is contested.
  5. Open challengesThe problems that remain unsolved — candidate research gaps.
  6. Research exercisesSmall tasks that require you to do something, not just read.
  7. Discussion questionsPrompts brought to the seminar for structured debate.

Example tutorial sequence

The first two units are shown below in full, as an illustration of how a unit's tutorials are ordered. Complete sequences for every unit appear on the unit pages.

Unit 1 — The Nature of AI Research (8 tutorials)
Tutorial Title
t-01 What is AI Research?
t-02 Research Paradigms
t-03 Scientific Method
t-04 Reproducibility Crisis
t-05 Research Ethics
t-06 Open Science
t-07 Case Studies
t-08 Review
Unit 2 — Research Methods and Literature Analysis (8 tutorials)
Tutorial Title
t-01 Reading Research Papers
t-02 Literature Mapping
t-03 Citation Networks
t-04 Experimental Design
t-05 Reproducibility Studies
t-06 Meta-analysis
t-07 Critical Review Techniques
t-08 Summary

Unit quizzes

Each unit concludes with a short online quiz of sixteen questions in total across the course — one quiz per unit. Quizzes are formative in spirit, may be attempted unlimited times, and exist to confirm that you have the conceptual vocabulary needed for the seminar discussion.

08 Assessment

Assessment is overwhelmingly research-based. The five assignments build the skills you need for the major project, which carries the largest weighting.

40%

Major research project

An original investigation culminating in a journal-style paper and symposium presentation.

30%

Five research assignments

Paper analysis, literature review, reproducibility study, proposal and pilot investigation.

10%

Proposal defence

Oral defence of your research question, method and evaluation plan.

10%

Symposium presentation

Conference-format talk with questions from faculty and peer review.

10%

Unit quizzes

Sixteen short online quizzes, one per unit, with unlimited attempts.

Weightings are indicative and confirmed in the course LMS.

Assessment tasks

Task, weighting, format and timing
Task Weight Format Due
A1 · Research Paper Analysis 6% Written critique, 1,500 words Week 3
A2 · Literature Review 6% Structured review with gap analysis, 2,500 words Week 6
A3 · Reproducibility Study 6% Implementation, results comparison and report Week 9
A4 · Research Proposal 6% Publishable-quality proposal, 2,000 words Week 12
A5 · Pilot Investigation 6% Dataset, preliminary results and analysis Week 16
Unit quizzes 10% 16 online quizzes, unlimited attempts Rolling
Proposal defence 10% Oral defence, 15 minutes plus questions Week 13
Major research project 40% Journal-style paper, 6,000–10,000 words, plus reproducibility package Assessment period
Symposium presentation 10% Conference-format talk, 15–20 minutes, plus poster Assessment period
Total 100% Pass mark 50%

Research assignments

Each assignment rehearses one component of the research process. Together they form a scaffold for the major project; completing them in sequence means that by the time you begin writing the final paper, most of the groundwork is already done.

A1 · Research Paper Analysis

Critique a recent AI paper.

  • Paper summary
  • Methodology critique
  • Strengths and weaknesses
  • Future directions

A2 · Literature Review

Conduct a structured literature review.

  • Research question
  • Literature matrix
  • Gap analysis
  • Review paper

A3 · Reproducibility Study

Replicate a published experiment.

  • Implementation
  • Results comparison
  • Reproducibility report

A4 · Research Proposal

Prepare a publishable-quality proposal.

  • Problem statement
  • Literature review
  • Methodology
  • Evaluation plan

A5 · Pilot Investigation

Conduct preliminary experiments.

  • Dataset
  • Experimental results
  • Analysis

Submission and marking

Submission format

  • Written work as PDF, in IEEE or ACM format for the project
  • Code submitted as a versioned repository with a tagged release
  • Environment specification included with every computational submission
  • Random seeds, configuration files and raw results recorded

Late submission

A penalty applies to late work unless an extension has been granted in advance. Extensions are granted for documented circumstances; compute failures, lost code and competing deadlines are not, by themselves, grounds for an extension — managing these is part of research practice.

Feedback

Written feedback is returned on each assignment within the university turnaround window. Assignment 4 and the proposal defence are explicitly designed to feed forward into the major project.

Reproducibility is assessed

For A3, A5 and the major project, your code, environment, seeds and data handling must allow an independent reader to reproduce your headline result. A finding that cannot be reproduced does not count as a finding.

09 Major research project

The project runs across the whole semester and carries 40% of your grade. You work through sixteen phases, from topic selection to final presentation, under regular supervision.

What you submit

  • Research question and gap analysis
  • Literature review and positioning
  • Method design and experimental setup
  • Reproducible code and collected data
  • Baseline comparison and proposed method
  • Evaluation, statistical analysis and discussion
  • Journal-style paper (6,000–10,000 words)
  • Research poster and symposium presentation

Project phases

  1. Topic SelectionChoose a research stream and a tractable area within it.
  2. Research QuestionFormulate a precise, answerable and worthwhile question.
  3. Literature ReviewMap what is known and how it has been established.
  4. Gap IdentificationArticulate exactly what is missing or unresolved.
  5. Hypothesis FormulationState a testable claim that your experiments can falsify.
  6. Method DesignDesign an approach that could genuinely answer the question.
  7. Experimental SetupSpecify datasets, metrics, controls and compute budget.
  8. Data CollectionGather, document and prepare the data you need.
  9. Baseline ModelsEstablish what existing methods already achieve.
  10. Proposed MethodImplement and train your approach.
  11. EvaluationMeasure performance rigorously against the baselines.
  12. Statistical AnalysisTest whether the difference is meaningful, not just present.
  13. DiscussionInterpret the results honestly, including negative findings.
  14. Future WorkIdentify what you would do next and what remains open.
  15. Research PaperWrite up the work to conference standard.
  16. PresentationPresent and defend your research at the symposium.

Project milestones

Supervision checkpoints across the semester
Checkpoint Phases Evidence required Timing
Stream selection 01–02 Chosen stream, draft research question Week 6
Proposal 03–07 Literature review, gap analysis, method and evaluation plan Week 12
Proposal defence 05–07 Oral defence of question, method and evaluation plan Week 13
Pilot results 08–10 Dataset, baselines, preliminary results Week 16
Full evaluation 11–13 Complete experiments, statistical analysis, discussion Assessment period
Final submission 14–15 Journal-style paper and reproducibility package Assessment period
Symposium 16 Presentation, poster and peer review Assessment period

Research tracks

You select one stream for your major research project and pursue it across the second half of the semester, supported by supervision sessions. Each stream is deliberately broad; your contribution will be a specific, tractable question within it.

Publication-oriented

The final paper is written in IEEE or ACM format and reviewed by faculty acting as a program committee. Strong submissions are encouraged to submit to undergraduate research venues, workshops or student tracks at conferences.

10 Research symposium

The semester concludes with a mini-conference. You present your work, defend your methodology, answer questions and review the work of your peers.

What you produce

  • Research poster — conference format, presented in a poster session.
  • Oral presentation — 15–20 minutes, followed by questions.
  • Journal-style paper — 6,000–10,000 words in IEEE or ACM format.

How the symposium runs

  • Students present papers, defend methodology, answer questions and review peers.
  • Faculty act as program committee, reviewers and session chairs.
  • Outcome a reviewed paper, a presented talk and structured peer feedback on your research.

Peer review is assessed

Reviewing the work of others is part of research practice. You will be asked to provide structured written reviews of at least two peer submissions, and the quality of those reviews contributes to LO6.

11 Semester schedule

One unit per teaching week, with assessment milestones running in parallel. The mid-semester break carries no new unit and is intended for project work.

Teaching schedule and assessment milestones
Week Unit Focus Milestone
1 U01 The Nature of AI Research A1 released
2 U02 Research Methods and Literature Analysis —
3 U03 Scaling Laws and Foundation Models A1 due
4 U04 Reasoning Models and Cognitive Architectures A2 released
5 U05 Neuro-Symbolic Intelligence —
6 U06 Causal Learning and Decision Intelligence A2 due Stream selection
7 U07 Physics-Informed and Scientific AI A3 released
8 U08 AI for Knowledge Discovery —
— Mid-semester break — no new unit; project work continues
9 U09 Multi-Agent Intelligence A3 due
10 U10 Federated and Collaborative Learning A4 released
11 U11 Embodied AI —
12 U12 Robotics and Autonomous Systems A4 due
13 U13 AI Alignment and Safety Proposal defences
14 U14 Governance of Advanced AI A5 released
15 U15 Artificial General Intelligence —
16 U16 Frontiers of AI Research A5 due Paper draft
AP Research symposium — presentation, poster and peer review Final paper due

AP = assessment period. Dates are confirmed in the LMS at the start of semester.

12 Resources and infrastructure

Research infrastructure is provided so that your work can be run, checked and reproduced. You are expected to design experiments that fit within realistic resource limits — which is itself a research skill.

Shared GPU compute Allocated project compute on the departmental cluster, with a documented quota.
Curated datasets Benchmark and domain datasets prepared for each research stream.
Research notebooks Starter notebooks for reproduction studies, baselines and evaluation harnesses.
Experiment templates Configuration, seeding and logging templates that satisfy the reproducibility requirement.
Writing templates LaTeX templates in IEEE and ACM format for the proposal, paper and poster.
Reference management Guidance and shared libraries for BibTeX-based bibliography management.
Research notebooks and templates Available from the resources section of the course site.
Open

Compute planning

Budget your compute before you begin. A well-scoped experiment that completes is worth more than an ambitious one that never finishes, and the ability to scope work realistically is explicitly part of LO2.

13 Academic integrity and generative AI

Research is built on trust. Fabricated results, undisclosed assistance and unattributed text are the most serious offences in this course because they corrupt the record on which everyone else depends.

Research misconduct

  • Fabricating or falsifying data, results or citations
  • Presenting another person's work or ideas as your own
  • Omitting a baseline or a result because it weakens your claim
  • Claiming reproducibility for work that has not been reproduced

Use of generative AI tools

Generative AI is a legitimate research tool and you are expected to be competent with it. Its use is permitted, with three conditions.

  1. DisclosureRecord which tools you used, for what purpose, and at what stage of the work.
  2. VerificationYou are responsible for the correctness of every claim, citation and line of code you submit, whatever produced it.
  3. AuthorshipThe intellectual contribution — the question, the method, the analysis and the argument — must be yours.

Citations must be real

Generated citations are frequently fabricated. Every reference in your work must be located, read and confirmed by you. A fabricated citation in a submitted paper is treated as research misconduct, not as a technical error.

Reproducibility as an integrity mechanism

Because your code, environment, seeds and raw results are submitted alongside your claims, the reproducibility requirement functions as a built-in integrity check. Work that cannot be reproduced cannot be verified, and unverifiable work is not research.

14 Support and accessibility

Academic support

  • Weekly research supervision for project guidance
  • Seminar discussion and structured peer review
  • Writing support for literature reviews, proposals and papers
  • Statistical and experimental design consultation on request
  • Library sessions on literature searching and reference management

Accessibility and inclusion

  • Adjustments are arranged through the university accessibility service
  • Alternative formats for course materials are available on request
  • Extensions and flexible arrangements for documented circumstances
  • All course pages meet the accessibility standards of the course site
  • Contact the course coordinator early so that adjustments can be put in place

Research is collaborative

You are expected to drive your own project, but you are not expected to do it alone. Ask questions in seminars, bring problems to supervision, and give your peers the kind of rigorous, constructive review you would want to receive.

15 Reading and research venues

There is no single textbook for COMP529. Reading is drawn from the primary literature, supported by a small number of methodological texts that every researcher should know.

Starting points by category
Category Representative sources Used for
Philosophy of science Popper, Conjectures and Refutations; Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions Unit 1 · research paradigms
Research methodology and reproducibility Ioannidis (2005), Why Most Published Research Findings Are False, PLoS Medicine; Pineau et al., Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research Units 1–2 · assignments 1–3
Foundational AI papers Primary papers per unit, beginning with Vaswani et al. (2017), Attention Is All You Need, and Kaplan et al., Scaling Laws for Neural Language Models Modules 2–4
Causal inference Pearl, Causality, and the structural causal model literature Unit 6
Scholarly writing IEEE and ACM author guidelines; current conference style guides Assignments 2, 4 and the project

Where to read and where to publish

You are expected to become familiar with the venues that define your chosen stream. At minimum, know the major conferences and journals in your area, their review criteria, and the difference between a workshop paper and a full conference submission.

Machine learning NeurIPS, ICML, ICLR and their workshop tracks.
AI systems and applications AAAI, IJCAI and domain-specific application venues.
Scientific ML Domain journals in physics, chemistry, biology and materials.
AI safety and governance FAccT, AIES and the safety and alignment literature.

Reading expectation

Expect to read two to four papers per week in depth, plus skim reading for literature mapping. Reading a paper properly means engaging with its method and its evidence, not summarising its abstract.

16 Document control

Syllabus version record
Item Detail
Document COMP529 Course Syllabus
Version 1.0
Applies to Semester 1
Owner Course coordinator, COMP529
Review cycle Reviewed annually before the start of semester
Supersedes Previous semester's syllabus
Changes Assessment weightings and deadlines are confirmed in the LMS at the start of semester. Any change to assessment is communicated in writing to all enrolled students.

Authoritative source

Where this syllabus and the LMS differ, the LMS record of confirmed dates and weightings takes precedence. Report any discrepancy to the course coordinator.

Begin the course

Start with Module 1, Unit 1 — what distinguishes AI research from AI practice, and why reproducibility is the discipline's central problem.

👤